Skip to content
Work
LOWUniversity computer-graphics and AI research laboratory12/2010–11/2012

Academic Plagiarism-Detection Workflow

Implementation and process owner

Exact implementation stack not documented

Problem

A university laboratory graded practical work from many students. Copied work is hard to spot by hand and it makes grading unfair. The lab needed a way to check submissions so its grades could be trusted.

Approach

  • I introduced a plagiarism detection system to the lab's practical courses.
  • I managed it myself next to my other work in the lab, where I led the practical part of the courses and graded students.
  • I built a user interface in Qt for the client application that used the plagiarism service.
  • I used the checks as part of the practical assessment, so grading stayed fair and objective.

Architecture and design decisions

  • The detection ran as a service. A desktop client built with Qt talked to it.

Outcomes

  • The lab got a working plagiarism check for practical work.
  • Grading became fairer and easier to defend.
  • The lab's credibility went up.

Known gaps

  • I do not say how the detection works or whether I wrote the service myself or set up an existing one.
  • I have no numbers on how many submissions were checked or how many cases were found.
  • I do not describe how staff handled a case once one was found.
  • I do not know if the system is still used today.

Get in touch

Hiring for architecture, technical leadership or applied AI engineering?

I answer questions about any of the case studies in detail, including the parts the source material does not cover.